In 2000, just four years before his death, “Superman” actor Christopher Reeve wrote in TIME magazine: With human embryonic stem cells. ” He further pointed out the potential to treat Alzheimer’s disease, heart disease, Lugeric’s disease, and spinal cord injury, as well as simple and basic embryonic stem cells. “Body repair kit”. While controversy intensified during President George Bush’s term, millions of people suffered. Today, there are more generous policies regarding funding for stem cell research.
“It’s quite possible that something goes wrong,” warns Eri San Francisco, University of California, and Arnold Kriegstein of the Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California. “Something similar to a crop can happen. This is a high risk area. The people have to prepare. This shows a recent story of a teenager who traveled from Israel to Russia for stem cell therapy discovered four years later that it was just a new brain tumor. Research on embryonic stem cells is far from perfect, Kriegstein admits, and it could take years for taxpayers to earn $ 3 billion in return on investment.
$ 3 billion has been allocated for stem cell research, but the cost of embryo research is high. For example, human clinical trials can cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Of course, nothing is more substantive than successful human testing, but what if it doesn’t work? “We all umbilical cord stem cells want the same thing. We want regenerative medicine to work,” J. Bruce Conklin of the David Gladstone Institutes said. “We have $ 2 billion left, but it’s actually a tiny amount. Now, if you’re spending everything on clinical trials that don’t tell you anything because it doesn’t work, you’re missing out on an opportunity.”
Despite the limitations of embryonic stem cells, there have been some important discoveries in recent years. For example, Japanese scientist Shinya Yamanaka discovered that adult stem cells can be transformed into pluripotent stem cells. This pluripotent stem cell has unlimited potential to transform into other cells. It has also been found that the human body is more likely to accept these new adult cells than embryonic cells. The additional implication is that you don’t have to destroy the embryo to advance science. This is what many supporters of life had for this study.